Describe an Image in French
How to describe an image in French?
In French class, you quickly encounter the following type of exercise: describing and analyzing an image. We have gathered explanations, advice, and vocabulary lists here to help you with this exercise. We have also written two examples to help you put all this new knowledge into practice. You’ll see—describing an image is quite fun!
Method
Identifying the image
First of all, it is important to correctly identify the image and find the information related to the document itself before starting the description. To do this, you should answer the following questions (as far as possible):
- Who is the author of the image?
- What is the title of the image?
- What is the date of creation or publication?
- What is the type of image: photograph, drawing, artwork, etc.? And if possible, what technique was used (black and white, color, oil painting, watercolor, etc.)?
- If it is a work of art: where is it kept? If it is a photograph: where was it published (country, newspaper title, book title, etc.)?
- Has the image been modified or cropped? What is the original format?
These first pieces of information are important and play a major role in the analysis and interpretation. Indeed, the image may have a political dimension (date, publication in a newspaper), a symbolic dimension (artistic movement), or simply a documentary character. It is therefore useful—and even necessary—to correctly identify the nature of the image.
The different types of images
Here is a non-exhaustive list of the different kinds of images you may encounter in this type of exercise:
- A painting
- A drawing
- A caricature (a satirical drawing or press cartoon)
- A photograph
- An illustration
- A graph (pie chart, bar chart, etc.)
- A film scene
- A poster (an advertisement)
- A map
- A comic strip panel
- …
Describing the image
In a second step, you can focus on what you see and describe the image. But be careful: you should organize your text so you do not jump randomly from one idea to another.
-
Start with the simplest question: Where does the scene take place? Or: what attracts attention at first glance?
- Then locate what you see in space: in the foreground, in the middle ground, in the background, in the center, at the top, at the bottom, on the left, on the right
-
Then focus on what is represented in order to give a more detailed description:
– Characters: Who are they? Are they known figures? What are they doing? Are they talking to each other?
– Animals: What are they doing?
– Objects: What do they look like?
– Landscape: What type of landscape is it? What is the light like? What time of day might it be?
– Symbol: What does it look like? What does it represent?
– Historical scene: How are the characters positioned? Are there symbols?
– A known event
Most often, you should begin with a general view and then make the description more and more precise by observing the details.
Be careful: do not express a personal opinion in this part. It should be written as objectively as possible.
This description helps you understand the subject and the main theme of the image: political, religious, historical, etc., and already gives you ideas for writing the third part.
Try to vary your vocabulary throughout the description. To introduce the different elements, you can use expressions such as:
- il s’agit deit is about
- la scène se passe à/enthe scene takes place in / at
- … est représenté/se trouve au premier plan… is represented / is located in the foreground
- on observe/on distingue/on peut voir/on remarquewe observe / we can see / we notice
- il y athere is / there are
- on peut identifier/on peut supposerwe can identify / we can suppose
Interpreting the image
Finally, you must provide a personal analysis of the image. Thanks to the detailed description, you now have all the keys you need. But be careful: this is not about repeating the description. In this part, you should express your opinion: What does the image make you think of? What feelings does it evoke? Are these feelings: Positive (curiosity, well-being, desire to escape, laughter)? Negative (anger, sadness, disgust)? Neutral?
Does the image try to make the viewer reflect on a particular theme? By what means? Try to understand how the image “works”, how it produces a certain thought or emotion.
Give your opinion: What is the author’s intention? What does the author want to show us? Find a main idea and explain your ideas clearly. Do not hesitate to use first-person expressions such as: je remarque queI notice that…, à mon avisin my opinion…, selon moiaccording to me…… You can also present hypotheses: je pense que l’auteur veut nous montrer queI think the author wants to show that……
From B2 level in French, learners usually try to use less personal expressions and present their analysis in a more neutral way (see the example).
In this section, remember to use all your knowledge: historical, economic, artistic, geographical context, the author’s biography, etc. These elements are often essential to analyzing an image. Very often, it is by placing the image in its context that we understand its function and the message it wants to convey.
Note
This rather subjective interpretation of an image is not appropriate if the document is a map or a graph. In that case, you must present the conclusions you reach after describing the image and talk about the topic or fact illustrated, for example: the favorite leisure activities of French people or migration flows in Europe. This type of exercise requires a great deal of precision.
Advice
f you want to practice describing works of art, you can visit the Louvre Museum website. There you will find a section called “Œuvres à la loupe” (“Artworks under the magnifying glass”) which presents fascinating analyses of famous works exhibited at the museum. Do not hesitate to write down words and expressions you like in a notebook, so you can later practice using them in your own texts.
Many museums offer descriptions of some of their artworks online, for example: the Musée d’Orsay, the Musée des Beaux-Arts de Bordeaux, the Palais des Beaux-Arts de Lille.
Example 1
La Liberté guidant le peuple
Source: Wikimedia Commons
For the French translation of Example 1, go to our French page.
Identification
This is an oil painting created by Eugène Delacroix in 1830, titled La Liberté guidant le peupleLiberty Leading the People. It is a large-format painting (2.60 × 3.25 m) preserved at the Louvre Museum.
Description
Thanks to the guiding lines of the painting and the effects of light, our eye is immediately drawn to the central figure: a woman of the people with a bare chest, holding a French flag in her right hand and a rifle in her left, while wearing a Phrygian cap on her head.
She seems to urge the people following her to move forward. All the objects she carries have a high symbolic value: this woman represents Liberty (as the title of the work indicates). She stands in the middle of a battle scene.
In the foreground, we can see three dead soldiers lying on the ground, mixed with the stones and beams of the barricade. A man emerges from the rubble, his entire body stretched toward the woman representing liberty, his eyes fixed on her.
To the left of Liberty, a street boy brandishes two pistols. To her right, two armed men (a worker and a man who looks more like a bourgeois) seem determined to follow her with courage and determination.
In the background, the crowd of insurgents is partly hidden by thick smoke—a sign of the many fights, gunshots, and explosions happening beyond the frame of the painting—which creates an apocalyptic atmosphere. On the right, we can distinguish the towers of Notre-Dame Cathedral and Parisian buildings.
The dominant colors are blue, white, and red, which stand out against shades of yellow, brown, and gray.
Interpretation
The scene takes place in Paris in 1830. Eugène Delacroix depicts a scene from the July Revolution of 1830, also called “The Three Glorious Days” (July 27, 28, and 29). During these three days of popular uprising against Charles X, the king—who wanted to impose severe restrictions on freedom of expression and the rights of the people—was forced to abdicate. A few days later, Louis-Philippe I established the July Monarchy.
This artwork, representing a recent historical event—a crowd of insurgents crossing a barricade—has a strong allegorical dimension. The painting is filled with symbols of the nation and liberty: the French flag, the Phrygian cap, the dominant colors blue, white, and red.
The woman with the bare chest is an allegorical figure of Liberty (she will even symbolize the French Republic in the following century). Although she represents more an idea than a real person, she mixes with the people, bringing together workers and bourgeois citizens and pushing them into battle. Violence is present everywhere in this combat scene. Wherever our gaze turns, we see weapons, dismembered bodies, and determined faces.
In La Liberté guidant le peuple, Eugène Delacroix sublimates the misery of the people by highlighting their heroism. Patriotism unites all the fighters, despite their social differences. This depiction of the Parisian people and the violence of the fighting during the July Revolution shocked many viewers at the time, and the work was initially harshly criticized by bourgeois society.
It should be noted that Eugène Delacroix is considered the leader of the French Romantic movement in painting. He breaks with the classical tradition and traditional historical painting. Instead of choosing a subject from ancient history or religion, he depicts a modern subject, representing its violence without hesitation. The Romantic fascination with revolutionary action and the patriotism of the era helped create a new artistic vision of the people and of history.
Conclusion
La Liberté guidant le peuple by Eugène Delacroix did not only impress people of his time. It has become an enduring symbol, representing even today the revolutionary ideal and the struggle for freedom. The painting has been used on several occasions—for example, on French 100-franc banknotes between 1978 and 1995. It is not unrealistic to think that this masterpiece, created by one of the greatest French painters, will continue to endure through the centuries while conveying its powerful political message.
Example 2
Number of kilometres travelled by bicycle in Europe (average, per person and per country)
Source: Wikimedia Commons
For the French translation of Example 2, go to our French page.
Identification
We are dealing with a graph presenting data, more precisely a horizontal bar chart. As the title indicates, it shows the average number of kilometres travelled by bicycle in Europe per person and per country. This chart was established on the basis of data from the European Athletic Association (EAA) in 2008.
Description
The chart is organised as follows: on the y-axis (vertical), 15 European Union countries are listed, followed in the last position by the average for these 15 countries. On the x-axis (horizontal), the number of kilometres is shown, from 0 to 1000. We are therefore dealing with numerical data (kilometres) for different countries: the chart shows a distribution. The mention of the source tells us that the data was collected in 2008.
This chart therefore makes it possible to visualise the average number of kilometres travelled by bicycle per person in 15 European Union countries during the year 2008.
On the y-axis, the countries are arranged in a very specific order. At the top are the countries whose inhabitants travel the greatest number of kilometres by bicycle per year, and then the order gradually decreases. At the bottom are the countries whose inhabitants travel the fewest kilometres by bicycle per year. The figure closest to the x-axis is the average for all these countries.
The country whose inhabitants travel the most kilometres by bicycle is Denmark (936 km on average in 2008), followed closely by the Netherlands (848 km). There is a large gap between second place and third place, since the inhabitants of Belgium travel on average only 322 kilometres per year (the figures drop from 848 to 322 kilometres in just one step). Belgium is followed by Germany (291 km), Sweden (271 km) and Finland (251 km), which are all very close to one another. Next come Ireland (184 km), Italy (154 km) and Austria (136 km). Three other countries follow with almost identical figures: Greece (76 km), France (75 km) and the United Kingdom (75 km). Finally, Portugal (29 km), Luxembourg (23 km) and Spain (20 km) are the countries whose inhabitants travelled the fewest kilometres by bicycle in 2008. The European Union average is 188 kilometres per person per year.
Several groups can therefore be identified: the first group at the top, between 848 and 936 kilometres (2 countries) ; the second group, between 251 and 322 kilometres (4 countries) ; the third group, between 136 and 184 kilometres (3 countries) ; the fourth group, between 75 and 76 kilometres (3 countries) ; the last group, between 20 and 29 kilometres (3 countries).
Interpretation
The first thing one notices when looking at this bar chart is the very large gap between the country whose inhabitants travelled the most kilometres by bicycle in 2008, Denmark (936 kilometres), and the country whose inhabitants travelled the fewest, Spain (20 kilometres): the gap is 916 kilometres. There is therefore a great deal of variation across Europe regarding the use of the bicycle as a means of transport.
One can observe that the use of bicycles is very common in Northern European countries (Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Sweden, Finland) and somewhat less common in Southern European countries (Greece, Portugal, Spain). However, this observation should be qualified: Italy ranks quite well in the chart (154 km), while the United Kingdom is only in 12th place (75 kilometres). The hypothesis of a strictly geographical distribution must therefore be nuanced.
Of course, the climate plays an important role in people’s habits regarding bicycle use as a means of transport: bicycles are probably used less in countries where it is very hot in summer, since cycling in high heat is unpleasant or even impossible. But this is also true for Northern countries, where winters are colder and rain is more frequent—weather conditions that could also discourage cyclists.
The geography of the countries does not seem to play a major role either. It is true that Denmark, the Netherlands and Belgium are relatively flat countries, but Italy, Greece and Austria, which are more mountainous, still obtain fairly good positions in the ranking.
The density of urbanisation may also be an important factor: in some countries, the distance from point A to point B may simply be longer to cover by bicycle.
This distribution may perhaps also be explained by a certain “cycling culture.” The countries at the top of the ranking are known for their commitment to ecology and sustainable development. Copenhagen, for example, is one of the greenest cities in Europe: many industrial services there rely largely on natural resources. In order to reduce carbon emissions and decrease air pollution, city policies have been introduced to encourage bicycle use: construction of many cycle paths, awareness campaigns, and so on. The bicycle is therefore genuinely part of everyday life for many Danes, Belgians and Germans.
Unfortunately, this is not yet really the case in Spain, Portugal, the United Kingdom or France, although more and more people are adopting the bicycle as a means of transport because of its benefits for health as well as its ecological advantages.
Conclusion
The hypotheses presented here may help us better understand the distribution of the data in this chart, but further information would be needed to confirm or refute them. It would be interesting to compare this chart with another one showing the same data for the year 2015 and observe the changes, since many European countries have made significant progress in environmental protection since 2008.

